Retour
Article pour les cliniciens

Une revue systématique de l'entraînement à haute intensité progressive pour la résistance musculaire des membres inférieurs comparé à d'autres entraînements à intensité chez les personnes âgées.



  • Raymond MJ
  • Bramley-Tzerefos RE
  • Jeffs KJ
  • Winter A
  • Holland AE
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;94(8):1458-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.022. Epub 2013 Mar 7. (Review)
PMID: 23473702
Lire le résumé Lire résumé des données probantes
Disciplines
  • - Médecine physique et réadaptation
    Relevance - 5/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 5/7
  • Santé publique
    Relevance - 5/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 5/7
  • - Gériatrie
    Relevance - 5/7
    Intérêt médiatique  - 4/7

Résumé (en anglais)

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of high-intensity progressive resistance strength training (HIPRST) on strength, function, mood, quality of life, and adverse events compared with other intensities in older adults.

DATA SOURCES: Online databases were searched from their inception to July 2012.

STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials of HIPRST of the lower limb compared with other intensities of progressive resistance strength training (PRST) in older adults (mean age = 65y) were identified.

DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently completed quality assessment using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and data extraction using a prepared checklist.

DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-one trials were included. Study quality was fair to moderate (PEDro scale range, 3-7). Studies had small sample sizes (18-84), and participants were generally healthy. Meta-analyses revealed HIPRST improved lower-limb strength greater than moderate- and low-intensity PRST (standardized mean difference [SMD]=.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], .40 to 1.17 and SMD=.83; 95% CI, -.02 to 1.68, respectively). Studies where groups performed equivalent training volumes resulted in similar improvements in leg strength, regardless of training intensity. Similar improvements were found across intensities for functional performance and disability. The effect of intensity of PRST on mood was inconsistent across studies. Adverse events were poorly reported, however, no correlation was found between training intensity and severity of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS: HIPRST improves lower-limb strength more than lesser training intensities, although it may not be required to improve functional performance. Training volume is also an important variable. HIPRST appears to be a safe mode of exercise in older adults. Further research into its effects on older adults with chronic health conditions across the care continuum is required.


Commentaires cliniques (en anglais)

Geriatrics

It has already been discussed, but it is good to have the highest evidence level in order to guide training intensities with regard to the outcome of interest.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

The lack of reporting adverse events in over 50% of the trials should motivate more physical medicine researchers to do a better job of tracking side effects and adverse events in this population of older adults in exercise programs. It was interesting to note that strength appears to improve more significantly with higher intensity exercise, but not functional performance. This suggests that future trials should consider mixed methods designs that incorporate a qualitative component; to see what clinical outcomes are relevant from the patient's perspective.

Public Health

Most of our elderly have chronic diseases and some of of those diseases are severe. Excluding those diseases from research studies decrease the applicability in our setting.

Public Health

The search was not complete. There was no search in Spanish or in the LILACS databases.

Voulez-vous savoir ce que lisent les professionnels? Inscrivez-vous pour accéder gratuitement à tous les contenus professionnels.

S'inscrire